Immigration Bonds And Mandatory Detention Your Dream is My Dream

Immigration Bonds and Mandatory Detention Law Firm in Tampa

The Immigration and Naturalization Act provides for release on a bond and parole. INA §236(a). These bonds should be granted unless the person is a threat to public safety or is subject to mandatory detention. INA §236(c). The Attorney General may revoke and arrest the immigrant at any time. INA §236(b).

Standards and Criteria of Immigration Bond

An immigration judge should issue a bond unless the person is likely to abscond, is a threat to public safety, or is subject to mandatory detention. Matter of Patel, 15 I&N Dec. 666 (BIA 1976). The immigrant has the burden of proof when it comes to threat to public safety. 8 CFR §§236.1(c)(8), 1236.1(c)(8). A bond hearing, however, may be necessary in cases of prolonged detention. The Supreme Court has ruled that INA 236(b) does not require a hearing after six months of detention. Jennings v. Rodriguez, 138 S.Ct. 830 (2018). The court, however, remanded the case the lower court to consider the constitutional challenges to the statute.

General Criteria for Bonds

In Matter of Patel, 15 I&N Dec. 666 (BIA 1976), the Board of Immigration Appeals delineated the following criteria for an immigration bond:

Fixed address in the United States
Length of residence in the United States
Family ties
Record of appearance in court
Employment history
Criminal record
Pending criminal charges
History of immigration violations
Manner of entry
Membership in community organizations
Financial ability to post a bond

A change in the immigrant’s circumstances, including losing his removal case, may lead to an increase in the bond. Matter of Sugay, 17 I&N Dec. 637 (BIA 1981). As mentioned above, in Jennings, the Supreme Court ruled that the statute does not have an implied 6 months limitation on detention. Immigration and Customs Enforcement may use other forms of incarceration other than physical detention. These alternatives include:

Intensive Supervision Appearance Program (ISAP)
Enhanced Supervision/ Reporting (ESR)
Electronic Monitoring

The Immigration Judge may reconsider non-monitory forms of supervision. Matter of Garcia-Garcia, 25 I&N Dec. 93 (BIA 2009).

Bond Procedure

The District Director with jurisdiction over the immigrant makes the initial determination as to bond. The Director must state the reasons for the decision. Matter of Daryoush, 18 I&N Dec. 352 (BIA 1982). The immigrant must be given access to his or her Alien File. Dent v. Holder, 627 F.3d 365, 371-76 (9th Cir. 2010). After the initial determination by ICE, motions for redetermination should be made to the immigration judge. Matter of P-C-M-, 20 I&N Dec. 432 (BIA 1991). These bond proceedings are separate and apart from removal proceedings. Matter of R-S-H-, 23 I&N Dec. 629, 630 (BIA 2003). As long as the person is in custody, he may make successive motions for redetermination. Matter of Uluocha, 20 I&N Dec. 133 (BIA 1989).

Mandatory Detention

Under 212(d)(2) some individuals are apprehended at the border and found inadmissible does not qualify for a bond but may apply for parole. These individuals include immigrants who are deemed arriving aliens as defined under 8 §§CFR 1.2. This group of individuals includes returning lawful permeant residents who are seeking admission under INA §101(a)(13)(C). As mentioned above, the Supreme Court in Jennings ruled that the statute does not include an implied 6 months limitation on detention.

Mandatory detention also applies to individuals mentioned in INA §236(c). This section of the law applies to the following individuals:

Persons who are inadmissible by having committed a crime under INA 212(a)(2)
Persons who are deportable for having committed multiple crimes involving moral turpitude, aggravated felonies, a drug offense, a firearm offense, or treason
Persons who committed a crime involving moral turpitude with a sentence of more than 1 year
The Persons involved in terrorist activities

This provision applies to persons who are released after October 9, 1998. Matter of Garcia Arreola, 25 I&N Dec. 267, 269 (BIA 2010). The effective date of INA 236(c) was April 1, 1997.

Continue Reading Read Less

Procedures Under Mandatory Detention

Although the immigration judge does not have jurisdiction over a person who falls under mandatory detention, they retain jurisdiction over the person’s classification. Matter of Joseph, 22 I&N Dec. 799 (BIA 1999). There is an automatic stay provision in the law when the Department of Homeland Security files a notice of intent to appeal.

Please give us a call if you have been placed in removal proceedings. Receiving a bond during removal may be the only way to remain with your family while in removal proceedings. Hiring an experienced immigration attorney like Ahmad Yakzan could be the difference you need.

Continue Reading Read Less

Making a Difference in Our Clients' Lives

Read Our Five-Star Client Testimonials

At American Dream Law Office, PLLC, your dream is my dream, and it shows in our reviews! See for yourself what our clients have to say about working with us.

"I actually received my letter"
I have nothing but great things to say about him, and I would highly recommend everyone that needs this process to be completed to work with Ahmad.

- Maria G.
"Your work impacts lives positively."
Your expertise made it possible for my brother and his family to achieve their goals through the E2 process.

- Former Client
"This stressful process was made so much easier"
Throughout the entire process Ahmad and his staff were responsive, professional and most of all comforting.

- Former Client
"He is on top of the game"
He knows the laws inside and out. He won our case/appeal after 9 years!!!

- Angel U.
"In Good Hands"
He guided us through the whole process and was transparent with every step and his fees. The whole team filled us with ease and made us feel we were in good, experienced hands.

- Former Client
"Professional, detail oriented, knowledgeable!"
Simple, American Dream Law Office Mr. Ahmad his team are the best Immigration attorney office in Tampa Bay area!!

- Former Client
"They demonstrated experience and mastery of the activity"
I am very grateful for your management !!

- Former Client
"His work is his passion, and it shows."
He works hard to ensure we were taken care of. He treated us like family from the start to finish

- Sara B.

View All Reviews

Contact Us Today

Headquarters Tampa

4815 E Busch Blvd., Ste 206
Tampa, FL 33617 United States

Get Directions
BY APPOINTMENT ONLY St. Petersburg

8130 66th St N #3
Pinellas Park, FL 33781

Get Directions
BY APPOINTMENT ONLY Orlando

1060 Woodcock Road
Orlando, FL 32803, USA

Get Directions
By Appointment Only New York City

495 Flatbush Ave. Second Floor
Brooklyn, NY 11225, USA

Get Directions
BY APPOINTMENT ONLY Miami

66 W Flagler St 9th Floor
Miami, FL 33130, United States

Get Directions